Hardline MP blasts European sanctions move as part of US-Israeli plot

Wall Street Journal reporter and veteran nuclear diplomacy watcher Laurence Norman wrote on Thursday that Iran's reaction to a European move to renew UN sanctions was measured but that diplomatic confrontation looms.

"Iran tells E3 to back a Russian plan to extend 2231 with no SnapBack provision and no real Iranian steps to meet conditions," he wrote on X. "If they were gonna do that, they wouldn’t have triggered SnapBack. That suggests diplomatic confrontation."

"Iran SnapBack statement full of attacks on E3 and reiteration of what Tehran says is illegal and baseless move by Europeans. But relatively light on specific threats. Says will “seriously undermine” talks with IAEA, though that’s vaguer than @Gharibabadi comments earlier," he added, referring to Iran's deputy foreign minister.

"And (Iran) warns of an “appropriate” response. So all options remain open. But it’s not closing off any immediate diplomatic paths. Which is worth at least noting."

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon said on Thursday that the European move to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran would help ensure international peace.

"I welcome the decision of Germany, France and the UK to reimpose sanctions against Iran," Danon said in a video message.

"Israel has already shown its commitment to fight the radical regime in Tehran. It is about time the international community will continue to apply more pressure, to apply more sanctions against this regime - that is the only way to ensure the safety and stability of the world."

Iran on Thursday blasted a move by Germany, Britain and France to trigger UN sanctions as malicious and illegal, upping the rhetorical ante in a diplomatic dispute which may fester during a 30-day period before they potentially take effect.

"The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran categorically rejects and condemns in the strongest possible terms the illegal declaration," it said in a statement.

"The abuse of the aforementioned mechanism in a situation where Iran's nuclear facilities have been severely damaged by an illegal attack by a former member of the JCPOA is a clear sign of malicious intent," it added, referring to the trigger mechanism and a 2015 nuclear deal to which Iran and the European powers are party.

Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful - an asserting Western countries doubt. Tehran argues that since a 2018 withdrawal by the United States, the nuclear agreement is defunct and can no longer be invoked by Europe as a means to restore international sanctions.

US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio on Thursday said Washington backed a move by France, Germany and Britain to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.

Citing "Iran’s continuing defiance of its nuclear commitments," Rubio said, "the United States supports the E3’s decision and urges Iran to engage in serious diplomatic negotiations to resolve the nuclear issue."

The United States withdrew from the 2015 international deal over Iran's disputed nuclear program during President Donald Trump's first term in 2018, meaning only other parties to the agreement are able to pursue sanctions on Iran for its perceived non-compliance.

Talks between Tehran and Washington ended abruptly in June when Israel launched a surprise military campaign on Iran, in a 12-day war capped off by US attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites.

France, Germany and the United Kingdom said on Thursday they tirelessly sought to engage with Iran about their concerns over Tehran's nuclear activities but were met with evasion and violations of a 2015 nuclear deal, according to a letter they sent to the UN Security Council on Thursday.

100%

"The E3 have consistently and in good faith sought to resolve with Iran issues with respect to Iran's non-compliance," the letter published by Germany's foreign ministry said.

"The E3 believe Iran to be in significant non-performance of its commitments," it added. "Since 2019 and as of today, Iran has increasingly and deliberately ceased performing its JCPoA commitments."

"Iran's actions stand in stark contrast to an exclusively peaceful use of its nuclear energy," the countries wrote.