Tehran names street after Nasrallah, replacing Sadat's assassin

Activists are urging citizens and business owners to halt the import and purchase of Iranian goods, with some deploying the social media hashtag "Boycott Iranian goods: a national demand".

More than half a million Afghans have been deported from Iran in the weeks after its 12-day conflict with Israel ended.

Iranian state-affiliated media have promoted unverified accusations that Afghan migrants were involved in espionage for Israel.

The Red Cross now warns that as many as one million more could be forced out by year’s end.

“We should not financially support a regime that humiliates, tortures, and discriminates against Afghan migrants,” wrote one Afghan user, Niloofar Yousefi.

“Until this injustice ends, we will raise our voices through this boycott.” She urged Afghan merchants to stop importing Iranian goods altogether.

In 2024, Iran accounted for between a quarter and a third of Afghanistan's $10.8 billion in total imports, World Bank figures show, making it the country’s largest trading partner by value.

Trade figures underline what’s at stake economically for Iran. Between March and June 2025 alone, Tehran exported $520 million in non-oil goods to Afghanistan. Over the course of 2024, that number reached $3.1 billion, placing Afghanistan among Iran’s top five export markets.

In the city of the Afghan city of Herat, a physician, Dr. Alireza Hashemi, announced he would stop prescribing Iranian-made medications in protest of Tehran’s treatment of Afghan nationals.

Another social media user, Nasim Kamgar, posted a video of a young Afghan child describing abuse at the hands of Iranian border guards.

“This is not our right,” she wrote, adding that Taliban policies have left Afghan migrants increasingly vulnerable to mistreatment abroad.

Iranian officials have insisted that only undocumented migrants are being deported, but both Afghan news outlets and international aid groups have reported otherwise.

Multiple cases have surfaced in which migrants with valid visas or residency papers were expelled—some even had their passports and identity cards torn up by Iranian border forces.

With public anger mounting and the boycott movement gaining traction, Iran’s economic ties to Afghanistan now face unprecedented strain—intensifying a rift between the two countries as hundreds of thousands of vulnerable Afghans face the threat of forced return.

More than 30 lawmakers have called for his dismissal, signaling a deepening power struggle masked only briefly by calls for post-war unity.

Hardliners accuse relative moderate Pezeshkian of overstepping his authority and plotting to steer the Islamic Republic toward normalization with Israel, without citing any evidence.

“The Pezeshkian administration will end the Islamic Revolution before the conclusion of his term,” MP and former ambassador Abolfazl Zohrevand said in a video that has gone viral.

“They believe that by ending the revolution and terminating Khamenei’s rule, they can begin a new era and join the Abraham Accords,” he added.

When asked if this amounted to a coup, Zohrevand replied, “What else could this be if not a coup d’état?”

While such rhetoric may appear extreme, it reflects a broader anxiety in Tehran about the future of the theocracy post-Khamenei—a question brought to the fore by his unprecedented absence from public life during and after Israeli strikes on Iran.

Presidential pushback

Pezeshkian himself has alluded to the infighting.

“We are not allowed to impose our views on others,” he told staff on July 13 according to an official readout. “Those who oppose us are not necessarily our enemies … We should not favor insiders over outsiders through coercion.”

A close adviser to Khamenei also addressed the clash—notably disapproving of the growing pressure on Pezeshkian.

“(Some) groups of Iranian politicians and political organizations are attempting to challenge the President’s political competence,” news outlet Asr-e Iran quoted Mohammad Mokhber as saying. “(It’s) a wrong move.”

Reformists sound the alarm

Some reformist voices now warn that what is unfolding is not post-war unity but dangerous fragmentation.

“The dust has not settled after the explosions, yet the sound of polarization is louder than the missile blasts,” former government spokesman Ali Rabiei wrote in Etemad Daily on July 10. “Let’s prevent societal fragmentation—this is precisely what the aggressors want.”

Nuclear scientist and ex-MP Ahmad Shirzad echoed the warning, calling for a more inclusive approach that would reconcile a largely alienated population.

“We need to return to the people and secure their partnership in governance. They must be able to see the government as their own,” Shirzad wrote in the reformist daily Arman Melli.

Calls for “national reconciliation” now function less as policy proposals than as signals of alarm: the war may have ended, but the political reckoning has only begun.

“The government must not dismiss societal demands,” Reform Front spokesperson Javad Emam said.

“It should release all political prisoners, invite political participation, and declare a general amnesty to facilitate the return of Iranian expatriates.”

The Alliance Against Islamic Regime of Iran Apologists (AAIRIA), an Iranian-American advocacy group, found Mahallati in Shiraz, where he is listed as a senior researcher at the Majd Research Center.

His biography on the center’s website claims he is a “full professor of Religious Studies and Peace Studies at Oberlin College”—though the college dismissed him in 2023.

Return under false credentials

In May 2025, Mahallati co-organized and participated in the Sixth Annual Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at the University of Tehran.

He moderated a panel and gave a talk titled “The Complex Nature of Human Conflicts... A Qur’anic Perspective.” The program listed him using his former Oberlin title.

Mahallati was removed from Oberlin after AAIRIA launched a campaign outlining his role in whitewashing the 1988 executions of thousands of political prisoners in Iran.

The group also highlighted his antisemitic and anti-Baha’i rhetoric during his time as a UN envoy, and multiple allegations of sexual abuse, including rape and harassment at Columbia University in the 1990s.

The US Department of Education launched an investigation into Oberlin in 2023 for allegedly tolerating antisemitism on campus.

Following his removal, Oberlin scrubbed his profile from its website.

New platform, familiar faces

Another speaker at the Tehran event was Ali Akbar Mousavi, previously listed as a senior advisor and postdoctoral researcher at George Mason University’s Center for World Religions, Diplomacy, and Conflict Resolution.

His university profile now leads to a "Not Found" error.

The conference listed Mousavi as speaking on “Technology for Peace and Transformation in Conflict Management.”

Iran International contacted George Mason for comment but received no reply.

Lawdan Bazargan, AAIRIA’s director, said: “The Islamic Republic has long weaponized the language of ‘peace’ and ‘friendship’ to sanitize its image while continuing repression and destabilization at home.”

“Figures like Mahallati and Mousavi lend academic legitimacy to this propaganda and should be held accountable," she added. "US institutions shouldn’t allow regime apologists to whitewash crimes as dialogue.”

Academic silence, state rhetoric

In what appears to be a rebranding effort, a 2024 website promoting Mahallati’s writings again lists him as a “full Professor of Religion in Islamic Studies” at Oberlin. The site provides no contact information.

Iran International contacted Oberlin’s VP of communications, Josh Jensen, and chief of staff David Hertz to ask whether the school has warned Iranian institutions or taken steps to stop Mahallati from using its name. No response was received.

Despite a three-year campaign by AAIRIA, Oberlin President Carmen Twillie Ambar and her staff refused to meet with Iranian-American advocates.

Though billed as a peace conference, the University of Tehran event included incendiary rhetoric.

Iranian science minister Hossein Simaee Sarraf called for Israel’s destruction: “It is hoped that... all Muslim nations and people of conscience will unite to overcome this savage and bloodthirsty regime,” he said.

Dr. Charles Randall Paul, founder of the US-based Foundation for Religious Diplomacy, also addressed the conference via Zoom. He did not respond to press inquiries.

Oberlin has largely ignored the Mahallati scandal since his removal. After student journalist Gigi Ewing graduated, the campus paper dropped coverage.

Ewing and her colleagues had earlier published a 2021 editorial titled “Evidence Against Mahallati Irrefutable."

The European Council said the designations target actors “responsible for committing serious human rights violations and abuses on behalf of Iranian state bodies outside of Iran,” including extrajudicial killings and arbitrary executions.

"Today’s listings confirm the EU’s concerns about transnational repression by Iranian state bodies through the use of proxy agents, in particular involving criminals and organized crime networks targeting dissidents and human rights defenders across the world, including on EU territory," it said in a statement.

Among those listed is the Zindashti Network, a criminal group linked to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), which the EU accused of carrying out assassinations of Iranian dissidents overseas.

The group's leader, Naji Ebrahim Sharifi-Zindashti, an Iranian narcotics trafficker and organized crime figure, was also sanctioned alongside five of his alleged associates.

The Council said the group was involved in the killings of Iranian dissident Masoud Molavi Vardanjani in Turkey and Saeed Karimian, the owner of Iran-focused satellite broadcaster Gem TV.

The EU also sanctioned Mohammad Ansari, identified as the leader of Unit 840 of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, for allegedly ordering the assassination of journalists critical of the Islamic Republic.

Reza Hamidiravari, an intelligence ministry officer said to oversee Zindashti’s state-backed operations, was also named.

Those designated face EU-wide asset freezes and travel bans. EU individuals and entities are also prohibited from making funds or resources available to them.

Last January, the US Treasury’s OFAC and UK government sanctioned Naji Ibrahim Sharifi‑Zindashti, leader of the Zindashti Network, along with 11 associated individuals for orchestrating assassinations, kidnappings, and murder‑for‑hire plots against Iranian dissidents. The sanctions hit Iranian officials involved in threats to kill Iran International TV journalists on British soil.

“The Iranian officials designated are members of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Unit 840, which was exposed in an ITV investigation into plots to assassinate two television presenters of Iran International news on UK soil,” the UK government said in a statement at the time.

The report came as France said it would trigger the UN snapback mechanism against Iran by the end of August if no tangible progress is made on a nuclear deal.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Tuesday that Iran has violated its commitments under the 2015 agreement and that France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, known as the E3, are justified in reapplying global embargoes on arms, banks, and nuclear equipment. “Without a firm, tangible, and verifiable commitment from Iran, we will do so by the end of August at the latest,” Barrot told reporters in Brussels.

In response, Tasnim warned that Iran could raise uranium enrichment from 60% to 90%, and may use its enriched uranium stockpile for what it called “non-prohibited military purposes.”

The outlet also said that while exiting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) would be a major step, it remains one of several options Iran is considering.

Snapback seen as 'military aggression' by Iranian officials

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi last week warned that triggering the snapback would be viewed by Iran as equivalent to a military strike. “This move would mark the end of Europe’s role in Iran’s peaceful nuclear file,” he said, calling it a “historic mistake” that could irreversibly damage ties.

Tasnim echoed that view, saying that the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, combined with European inaction, have shifted Tehran’s strategy from "political patience to strategic deterrence".

Iran may expand nuclear activity, restrict IAEA oversight

In its report, Tasnim said Iran "should halt dilution of 60% enriched uranium, accelerate advanced centrifuge deployment, expand research into uranium metal production, and scale back cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)."

“These responses are lawful and proportionate,” the outlet said, while warning that Tehran would not accept any further Western pressure without consequences.