Iran International
Iran has witnessed the rapid growth of a group known as ‘eulogists’ during the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s three decades of leadership, playing a very prominent role not only in religious ceremonies, but also in the country's political sphere.
Khamenei has become a huge patron of the country's eulogists, inviting them to perform at ceremonies he holds at his residence for religious occasions such as commemoration ceremonies to mark the deaths of Shia saints. His predecessor, Ruhollah Khomeini who founded the Islamic Republic only used the services of clerics at such events.
Khamenei received a large group of eulogists who performed at his residence on Sunday. In his speech to the group, he spoke of the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and denied that Iran has proxy forces in the region, and said the eulogists were artists who “make jihad with words”.
"Eulogy is a real media tool ... for elucidation [of the truth],” he said.
Q. Are ‘eulogists’ clergymen?
Most ‘eulogists of the Prophet’s household’ (maddah-e ahl-e beyt) are laymen with no seminary training or place in the clerical hierarchy.
Q. What role do eulogists play in religious ceremonies?
Eulogists recite and sing verses in praise of the Prophet Muhammed and his household, particularly at ceremonies such as Ashura to mourn Shia Imams on the anniversary of their death. Professional eulogists have found a much more prominent role than clerics in these ceremonies in the past three decades.
Q. How many eulogists are there in Iran now?
Over 100,000 professional and amateur eulogists perform in Ashura and other religious ceremonies across Iran. However, there are no official figures on the number of professional eulogists who are members of large and small professional associations such as Khaneh-ye Maddahan (Eulogists' House).
Q. How do eulogists earn their living?
Professional eulogists earn their living mainly by performing at ceremonies for fixed fees alongside businesses they may run. Many others who may be considered amateurs have ordinary jobs or businesses and perform for free or a small ‘gift’ from the organizers of such events.
Some eulogists such as Mansour Arzi and Mahmoud Karimi, two of Khamenei’s favorites, have gained celebrity status in the past three decades. Iranian media have on many occasions alleged that ‘celebrity eulogists’ only attend ceremonies in return for very hefty fees.
In a recent online interview, Hamidreza Alimi, a eulogist who says earns his living by selling household appliances, claimed that some of his peers demand as much as two billion rials for a few hours of performance. He also alleged that these eulogists ask for cash payments to avoid paying taxes on their incomes.
Q. What benefits do eulogists receive from the government?
In 2015, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei ordered the establishment of a foundation to provide government welfare services including health insurance to professional eulogists.
The foundation, named after Dibil bin Ali al-Khuzai, a seventh-century Shia poet, does not have a separate budget. However, it receives huge donations from various government and state bodies such as the Islamic Propaganda Organization and municipalities for “cultural activities”.
Professional eulogists also enjoy numerous perks from government and state bodies including priority in the allocation of housing and loans.
Q. What is the relationship between eulogists and political groups?
Most ‘celebrity eulogists’ have strong ties with ultra-hardline political parties and groups and often use religious ceremonies to campaign for them during parliamentary and presidential elections.
In their speeches and performances, these eulogists freely attack political rivals. Some are known for slandering top officials of the rival camp with immunity.
Mansour Arzi, a veteran eulogist known for his notorious attacks on several presidents including Mohammad Khatami, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he fell from Khamenei’s favor, and Hassan Rouhani, published his own list of candidates in the parliamentary elections of February 2024.
Arzi officially supported Saeed Jalili in the snap presidential elections of July and on several occasions publicly attacked Masoud Pezeshkian for criticizing the harsh enforcement of hijab.
Eulogists are also often invited as pre-sermon speakers at state-sponsored Friday prayer gatherings.
Q. Are all eulogists aligned with the ruling political establishment?
Some eulogists only perform at the behest of religious groups organized by ordinary citizens and refuse to get involved in politics. Some others support reformists or dissident clerics such as the Qom-based Ayatollah Sayyid Sadiq Shirazi who is highly critical of Khamenei's religious views and rule.
Since the disputed elections of 2009 that brought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power, some eulogists have used the story of the martyrdom of the Prophet’s grandson, Imam Hussain, to express their opposition to an interpretation of Islam that the Islamic Republic has been promoting for four decades during the Ashura ceremonies held in Imam Hussain’s memory.
In July 2023, during an Ashura ceremony in Dezful, the eulogists leading the ceremony fearlessly sang lyrics that openly criticized the political establishment and its insistence on enforcement of hijab, an issue which has seen the country thrown into revolutionary fervor since 2022's Women, Life, Freedom uprising.
Since Khamenei explicitly said that he was speaking as the leader of the Islamic Republic and not offering an analysis, his words could signal that hostility toward Syria’s new government is now official policy for the Islamic Republic. This may serve as a directive for the Quds Force, the IRGC’s foreign operations branch.
This speech, Khamenei’s 1,936th during his 35-year tenure, delivered a clear message about the Islamic Republic’s position on Syria's new administration. While many regional nations have expressed hope for peace and stability in Syria, Khamenei underscored the need to oppose the new government, essentially advocating for its overthrow.
"The young Syrian has nothing to lose. His university is unsafe, his school is unsafe, his home is unsafe, his street is unsafe, his life is unsafe. What should he do? He must stand strong and determined against those who designed this insecurity and those who implemented it, and God willing, he will triumph over them," Khamenei said.
Khamenei also denied the existence of proxy groups tied to the Islamic Republic, even though such groups are widely recognized globally as Iran’s proxies. Organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Houthis, and Hashd al-Shaabi have openly acknowledged their dependence on and allegiance to Iran.
Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, who was recently killed in an Israeli strike, repeatedly affirmed that Hezbollah relies entirely on Iran for its financial, military, and logistical support. This dependency is not unique to Hezbollah. Both the Houthis and Hamas have frequently acknowledged receiving financial and military assistance from Iran. Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior Hamas leader, once disclosed that during a visit to Tehran, Qasem Soleimani personally handed him $22 million in cash, which Hamas representatives transported back to Gaza in suitcases. These statements from the leaders of these groups directly challenge Khamenei’s assertions that these forces operate independently and are not proxies of Iran.
Khamenei further claimed that the Islamic Republic does not need proxies and is capable of acting directly against the US and Israel if necessary. This assertion contradicts his admission just ten days earlier in another speech, where he acknowledged that Iran’s efforts to support Bashar al-Assad were thwarted by Israeli and US air forces.
Not only did Khamenei deny the existence of Iran's proxy forces, but he also refused to acknowledge the evident setbacks faced by Iran and its allied groups in the region. While Israel has destroyed Hamas infrastructure in Gaza, eliminated many of its leaders, including Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar, and targeted Hezbollah’s command network, Khamenei continues to claim victory. These statements starkly contrast with the on-the-ground realities. Regional and international analysts widely agree that Iran's regional policies have failed. Israel's military strategy has successfully pushed Hezbollah away from the border, limiting its access to Israeli territory. Despite these setbacks, Khamenei persists in his analyses, insisting that Hezbollah has not been defeated.
Khamenei’s refusal to accept the realities in the region and his continued reliance on flawed analyses stem more from obstinacy than from genuine miscalculation. Rather than acknowledging his mistakes, he attempts to reshape facts to align with his vision. This stubbornness has wasted Iran’s financial and human resources while deepening animosity among regional nations and governments toward Iran.
Moreover, Khamenei not only dismisses external realities but also attempts to silence domestic critics. In his recent speech, he targeted opponents of the Islamic Republic's regional policies, branding them as mercenaries. This follows earlier threats in which he accused dissenting analysts of treason and demanded punitive measures against them. This repressive approach highlights Khamenei's growing concern over the potential domestic fallout from his regional policy failures and their impact on the Islamic Republic’s stability.
Denying failures and silencing critics will not resolve any issues; rather, they will exacerbate internal dissatisfaction and further isolate the Islamic Republic both regionally and globally. This persistent denial and obstinacy have already inflicted significant costs on the Iranian people. Khamenei's insistence on opposing Syria's new government and risks not only deepening regional instability but also fueling anti-Iran sentiment among the Syrian population and neighboring countries.
Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said that while Iran has actively engaged with opposition groups, it does not maintain direct ties with Syria’s ruling faction, responsible for the overthrow of the decades-long Assad dynasty.
“Our involvement has always been about preventing ISIS's advance and the spread of terrorism to regional countries,” Baghaei said during a press briefing in Tehran on Monday.
He added that Iran’s focus included advancing Syria’s political processes and preventing the country from becoming a haven for extremist groups.
“The issue of various terrorist groups operating in Syria has been a major concern since the beginning of developments in Syria 13 years ago,” he said.
Iran has long had a military presence in Syria, as has its armed allies such as Lebanese Hezbollah, designated as a terrorist group by nations such as the UK and US.
Responding to speculation about a message from Syria’s leadership via Turkey, Baghaei said that regional concerns, including Syria, are often addressed during multilateral discussions.
“Our stance is to preserve Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while ensuring that the Syrian people determine their fate without foreign interference,” he added.
After the storming of the embassy
Baghaei described a coordinated effort involving Iran’s embassies in Damascus and Beirut to evacuate nationals.
“At present, no non-resident Iranian nationals remain in Syria,” he said, adding that Iranians, including military advisors and diplomatic staff, were successfully evacuated during the recent unrest which saw the Iranian embassy ransacked.
Prospects for nuclear negotiations
Turning to nuclear negotiations, Baghaei said Iran is committed to dialogue. “The Islamic Republic of Iran has never shut the door on negotiations. We have always participated in good faith, despite many concerns being unfounded,” he said.
Referencing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Baghaei said that Iran’s cooperation had yielded agreements in the past but criticized the lack of follow-through by other parties.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, was signed in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 group of countries (the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany).
The agreement aimed to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program by imposing strict limits on its uranium enrichment activities and granting extensive access to international inspectors in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
Despite its initial success in curbing Iran's nuclear advancements, the deal faced challenges, particularly after the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 under the Trump administration and re-imposed sanctions on Iran.
This withdrawal led to a gradual erosion of the agreement, with Iran scaling back its commitments in response and since, escalating its nuclear program beyond international limits.
Efforts to revive the JCPOA have been ongoing, reflecting its significance in promoting regional stability and preventing nuclear proliferation. However, negotiations remain complex, with both sides expressing concerns over compliance and mutual trust.
Baghaei denied reports of a message being sent from US President-elect Donald Trump.
Iran-Turkey relations and broader goals
Baghaei also highlighted the importance of maintaining strong ties with Turkey, describing it as a significant regional neighbor.
“We are committed to good-neighborly relations with Turkey, which benefit both nations,” he said. While acknowledging occasional differences, Baghaei expressed confidence in ongoing dialogue to resolve disputes.
Recent tensions between Iran and Turkey over Syria have highlighted the complexities of their regional relationship. While both nations have historically cooperated on various issues, their conflicting interests in Syria have created friction as each vies for power.
Iran, a staunch supporter of Syria's government under Bashar al-Assad, has expressed concerns over Turkey's help to the ruling group in Syria which ousted Assad after 13 years.
Turkey, on the other hand, justifies its actions as necessary to combat Kurdish militias, which it considers terrorists.
“The region’s security depends on collective adherence to international obligations and the rejection of foreign interference,” Baghaei added, Syria having played a critical role in Iran's regional foreign policy since the outbreak of Syria's civil war, with multiple bases spread out across Syria and forces in place.
