• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Iran approached two Persian Gulf states for UAE-style de-escalation pact - Reuters

Jun 13, 2026, 10:23 GMT+1
People way the sunset over Dubai, with a general view of the Dubai skyline, including Burj Khalifa, center, amid the US-Israel conflict with Iran, in United Arab Emirates, March 6, 2026.
People way the sunset over Dubai, with a general view of the Dubai skyline, including Burj Khalifa, center, amid the US-Israel conflict with Iran, in United Arab Emirates, March 6, 2026.

Iran has approached at least two Persian Gulf Arab countries seeking arrangements similar to one reportedly discussed with the United Arab Emirates, under which Tehran would halt missile and drone attacks in exchange for economic and security understandings, Reuters reported, citing a source familiar with the matter.

Reuters said the reported UAE-Iran arrangement would include a halt to Iranian attacks on the UAE and a rebuilding of bilateral ties, including intelligence sharing and economic cooperation.

The report said Iranian Revolutionary Guards officials visited Abu Dhabi last week to meet Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser and deputy ruler of Abu Dhabi, and that UAE officials later traveled to Tehran to discuss details of the mechanism.

Reuters said the reported arrangement marked a tactical shift after weeks in which the UAE had been heavily targeted by Iran during the US-Israeli war with the Islamic Republic. Iran’s last known direct attack on the UAE was a May 4 strike on Fujairah port.

Most Viewed

Will the Islamic Republic trade with the 'Great Satan'?
1
INSIGHT

Will the Islamic Republic trade with the 'Great Satan'?

2

Cyber campaign posing as Iran International staff continues

3

Caspian seals face extinction threat as deaths continue

4

Ships face conflicting Iran, US instructions in Strait of Hormuz - FT

5

Students protest exam schedule, demand postponement of final tests

Banner
Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Tehran bread prices jump up to 100% in latest increase

    Tehran bread prices jump up to 100% in latest increase

  • Rising gym fees push fitness beyond reach for many Iranians
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Rising gym fees push fitness beyond reach for many Iranians

  • Relief or resistance? Tehran dailies offer diverging readings of talks
    INSIGHT

    Relief or resistance? Tehran dailies offer diverging readings of talks

  • Will the Islamic Republic trade with the 'Great Satan'?
    INSIGHT

    Will the Islamic Republic trade with the 'Great Satan'?

  • Iran's postwar rallies become flashpoint in diplomacy debate
    INSIGHT

    Iran's postwar rallies become flashpoint in diplomacy debate

  • MoU's forgotten casualty is the Iranian people
    OPINION

    MoU's forgotten casualty is the Iranian people

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran lawmaker frames Hormuz transit-fee plan as historic as oil nationalization

Jun 13, 2026, 09:25 GMT+1

The head of Iran’s parliament National Security and Foreign Policy Committee said a proposed bill on managing the Strait of Hormuz would cover transit rules and what he called the rights of the Iranian nation.

Ebrahim Azizi said the plan, formally described as a bill for the security, development and progress of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, would be a “complete and comprehensive” law if passed by parliament.

He compared the initiative to the nationalization of Iran’s oil industry, calling it a lasting measure.

Iran judiciary chief says confrontation with US will not end

Jun 13, 2026, 09:14 GMT+1

Iran’s judiciary chief said Tehran’s confrontation with the United States and its allies would not end, using a message on the anniversary of the 12-day war to warn against trust in Washington.

“Our battle with the front of the wicked and arrogant has no end, except with the uprooting of oppression and arrogance,” Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei wrote.

He added that the Islamic Republic has “absolutely no trust” in the United States, saying the mistrust was rooted in historical experience.

Ejei also called for national unity and said Iran’s armed forces remained central to what he described as the country’s deterrence after last year’s war.

Conservative Iranian daily rebukes hardliners opposing US talks

Jun 13, 2026, 09:06 GMT+1

Conservative Iranian daily Javan criticized hardliners who reject any negotiation with the United States, saying talks can be part of the same confrontation rather than a retreat from it.

The newspaper said some critics “do not accept any discussion or negotiation” and cannot understand that diplomacy can function like war or as its continuation.

It mocked those who argue Iran stopped fighting just as the enemy’s defenses were exhausted, saying they imagined Tehran had reached the moment of final victory and should not have halted the war.

Javan said many critics of the talks lack military knowledge and are wrongly comparing the current conflict with the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, which it noted also did not end without negotiation.

The paper said Trump and the United States remain hostile, but argued that opposing every diplomatic move because of Washington’s history is a weak argument.

“Negotiation does not mean compromise, losing guarantees or being deceived by a bullying and oath-breaking side,” Javan wrote, adding that governments can fight and negotiate at the same time.

The daily said Iranians should trust the leadership and negotiators to prevent political chaos, describing negotiation not as a tool to remove hostility but as a way to manage the enemy.

It warned that both blanket opposition to talks and claims that Iran has no choice but to accept a deal only benefit the enemy.

Iran mined tunnel entrances of nuclear sites amid fears of US seizure plan - CNN

Jun 13, 2026, 08:32 GMT+1

Iran has sharply escalated efforts to seal off its near bomb-grade uranium stockpile, deliberately collapsing tunnels and placing explosive mines at entrances amid fears of a possible US operation to seize the material, CNN reported, citing five sources familiar with US intelligence.

The report said access to roughly half a ton of highly enriched uranium is now far more difficult, dangerous and time-consuming than it was a month ago, when President Donald Trump was publicly suggesting the US military could move to seize it.

The added fortifications could complicate a proposed US-Iran deal that Washington says would require Tehran to turn over its enriched uranium for destruction and removal from the country.

CNN said most of the stockpile is believed by the international community to be in collapsed tunnels at the Isfahan nuclear complex, with some material held at other sites.

Experts cited by CNN said even Iran would now face a risky and complex task retrieving the uranium, requiring heavy excavation equipment and de-mining operations.

Scott Roecker, a former senior US nuclear material removal official, said the situation could also give Iran room to claim part of the stockpile is irretrievable, raising doubts over full verification.

CNN previously reported that the US military prepared plans in May for a possible ground operation inside Iran to seize the material, but Trump paused the plan after warnings it could trigger severe Iranian retaliation, prolong the war, disrupt the global economy and cause significant US casualties.

The report said the removal of Iran’s uranium under any deal would likely require a specialized US mobile uranium facility organized through the National Nuclear Security Administration at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Trump has said securing the material is a priority in negotiations to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but CNN said even top nuclear removal experts would need significant time to complete the task.

Iranian daily says US-Iran deal would only delay ‘final battle’

Jun 13, 2026, 07:54 GMT+1

Iranian daily Khorasan said a possible agreement between Tehran and Washington would only delay what it described as a final confrontation between Iran and the United States, rather than resolve the underlying conflict.

In a commentary, the newspaper said any deal at this stage should be seen as an agreement to end the current war, not a settlement of the core disputes between Tehran and Washington.

“The issues between Iran and America, and especially Iran and Israel, have reached the level of an existential battle that will in practice end only with the decisive victory of one side,” Khorasan wrote.

The paper argued that negotiations and agreements would have little effect on that trajectory, describing them as a temporary phase before what it called the “final battle.”

It said the main function of a deal would not be recognition of Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz, the release of blocked Iranian assets or any other real gain written into the text, but rather “postponing the final battle” and giving both sides time to rebuild.

“The main function of this agreement is a breathing space and a chance to rebuild offensive and defensive combat power and prepare for a full-scale and major battle,” the paper wrote.

Khorasan’s commentary adds to hardline criticism inside Iran of a possible memorandum of understanding with the United States, even as Iranian officials say the text is in final review and could be signed remotely if talks are completed.