FM says radiation risks exist at Iran’s bombed nuclear sites
Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi contradicted earlier assurances from Tehran by saying there is a risk of radiation release at nuclear facilities bombed during the 12-day war.
Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi contradicted earlier assurances from Tehran by saying there is a risk of radiation release at nuclear facilities bombed during the 12-day war.
In an interview with Japan’s Kyodo News on Sunday, Araghchi said strikes on Iran’s “peaceful” nuclear facilities had created serious dangers, including possible radiation exposure and unexploded ordnance.
“We are now facing security threats and safety concerns,” he said.
Following the joint US-Israeli attacks, Iranian authorities refused to evacuate surrounding towns and repeatedly dismissed public fears.
In late June, deputy health minister Alireza Raeisi said enrichment “does not involve nuclear fission” and therefore cannot generate harmful radiation, adding that measurements around Natanz and Fordow showed the areas were completely safe.
The IAEA likewise reported on June 13 that it had detected no radiation increase around Natanz.
Despite this, Araghchi told Kyodo that Iran cannot currently resume IAEA inspections because no protocol or guideline exists for inspectors entering damaged facilities. IAEA director general Rafael Grossi has said most of Iran’s enriched-uranium stockpile is being kept at sites in Isfahan, Fordow and Natanz where inspectors lack access, and warned in October that monitors had observed activity around storage locations.
Iran signals conditional openness to new talks
Tehran, Araghchi said, could restart talks with Washington “as soon as they accept a logic of confidence-building” that trades sanctions relief for restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program. He insisted any framework must recognize Iran’s “right to enrichment.”
Before the 12-day conflict, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of talks that broke down over Iran’s refusal to end domestic enrichment.
Iran, Araghchi added, is prepared to accept supervisory mechanisms “beyond the NPT” and time-limited limits on enrichment levels and centrifuge types, recalling that Tehran had accepted the 3.67-percent cap for 15 years under the JCPOA. US officials under President Trump have demanded zero enrichment, dismantling of proxy forces and limits on Iran’s missile program – terms Tehran calls unacceptable.
The foreign minister’s comments highlight mounting safety concerns, stalled nuclear diplomacy and widening gaps with the IAEA at a moment when Iran faces growing pressure to restore inspectors’ access.
In a letter addressed to Google, Meta, YouTube and Amazon Web Services, the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with the Iranian People warned that Iran’s widening use of AI-driven surveillance, recurrent shutdowns and a “white SIM card” scheme for officials had created a two-tier digital system isolating ordinary citizens.
The Iranian government enforces some of the world’s toughest online restrictions, blocking platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, and Telegram for the general public. Most people rely on slow, unreliable VPNs that authorities routinely disrupt.
By contrast, X's new location feature recently revealed that select users receive government-issued SIM cards or whitelisted connections to bypass national filtering and throttling altogether.
The issue drew wide attention over the past few weeks, when the X feature revealed numerous pro-government figures were posting from inside Iran without VPNs – despite long claiming they used the same circumvention tools as ordinary citizens.
The disclosures triggered heavy public criticism, with many describing the system as “digital apartheid” or a “caste-based internet” that rewards political loyalty and entrenches inequality.
EU says firms must bolster anti-censorship tools
Hannah Neumann, who chairs the EU delegation, said a free internet remains the only barrier against propaganda and intimidation. “Technology companies are the guardians of this freedom, and now is the time to take their responsibility seriously,” Neumann said, according to a copy of the letter obtained by Euronews.
She added that companies were capable of measures that “ensure these voices are not silenced.”
Deputy chair Bart Groothuis said digital repression had become central to Iran’s authoritarian model. “By supporting tools to circumvent filters, we can improve secure communication and give Iranians access to the free internet,” he said.
The letter urged firms to fund open-source VPN and censorship-bypass projects, expand encrypted communication features and develop in-app proxies to keep users connected during outages. It also asked Amazon Web Services and human-rights–oriented VPN providers to offer free or discounted server space to stabilize services for Iranian users.
European legislators pressed Google to continue backing Jigsaw, Outline VPN and its SDK, and to consider integrating these tools into major apps. Meta was asked to embed filter-bypass technologies into Instagram, Facebook and Threads. Companies were also urged to provide simple procedures for appealing blocked accounts and to increase cooperation with digital-rights groups.
US lawmakers pursue parallel push
In Washington, lawmakers introduced the FREEDOM Act on Thursday, which would require the secretary of state, the FCC and the Treasury to assess technologies capable of supporting unfiltered internet access for Iranians.
Representative Claudia Tenney highlighted the potential of satellite-to-mobile systems that could “bypass the limitations of censorship and government networks.” The feasibility review will also evaluate UAV-based platforms and counter-jamming tools.
Representative Dave Min, whose district includes a large Iranian-American community, said promoting internet freedom strengthens global family ties while confronting authoritarian practices.
