Iran parliament speaker sends anti-terror finance law for implementation
Iran parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf
Iran parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has sent to President Masoud Pezeshkian the law approving the country’s accession to the UN anti-terror finance convention, with conditions that limit implementation to Iran’s constitution and domestic laws.
Ghalibaf issued the notification under Article 123 of the constitution, which requires the speaker to forward approved legislation to the president for enforcement.
The law is part of Iran’s effort to meet Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards requiring countries to monitor and report financial transactions to curb money laundering and terror funding.
Mohsen Dehnavi, spokesman for the Expediency Council, said Iran’s accession was approved with two safeguards. Parliament attached a clause requiring the government to act within the framework of the constitution, and the council added that the Islamic Republic would implement the treaty only insofar as it aligns with domestic laws.
“If any part of the convention conflicts with Iran’s internal legislation, national laws will take precedence,” Dehnavi said. “The Expediency Council approved joining the convention based on these two conditions.”
The move came days after lawmakers voted down a bid to block the government from joining the United Nations convention against terror financing. Lawmakers rejected the motion with 150 votes in favor, 73 against and nine abstentions out of 238 members present. The proposal, introduced by conservative lawmakers, sought to halt Iran’s conditional approval to join the convention.
Earlier this month, the Expediency Council, which resolves disputes between parliament and the Guardian Council under Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, gave conditional approval for joining the treaty after years of delay, saying implementation would depend on guarantees that Iran’s economic and security interests are protected.
Backers see relief, opponents fear exposure of financial networks
Hardline lawmakers say joining the UN anti-terror finance convention could expose Iran’s financial networks used to bypass US sanctions and support regional allies. Supporters argue that compliance could reconnect the country’s banks to global systems and attract investment amid a deep economic crisis.
Mohammad-Mehdi Shahriari, a member of parliament’s national security committee, said on Saturday that reopening debate on the Countering Financing of Terrorism bill was illegal and would deepen Iran’s isolation, ILNA reported.
He said President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government had obtained the Supreme Leader’s consent to review the measure after expert study. “The CFT was approved with conditions and safeguards after a long process involving parliament, the Guardian Council, and the Expediency Council,” he said.
Shahriari criticized ultraconservative lawmakers for trying to block progress. “Our revolutionary brothers said it was not the right time to discuss this,” he said. “But with so many barriers in trade and banking, the Palermo and CFT bills can ease the burden created after years of sanctions.”
Revisiting the bill in parliament was illegal because the Supreme Leader had already authorized its review, he said.
Regional ties and economic impact
Failure to adopt global financial rules has worsened Iran’s economic problems and strained ties even with friendly states, Shahriari said. “Russia and China have both said that our refusal to join FATF conventions complicates trade with them,” he said. “When most countries have joined and only Iran and North Korea stand apart, what purpose does it serve except more isolation?”
The United States has for decades accused Tehran of using its regional allies to fund and organize attacks, labeling Iran the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism for 39 consecutive years.
Iran parliament speaker sends anti-terror finance law for implementation | Iran International
Iran will no longer implement any of its commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal, which expired on Saturday, the country’s foreign minister told the United Nations, once again refusing to acknowledge the reimposition of UN sanctions triggered by European powers last month.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a letter to the UN secretary-general and the president of the Security Council that the resolution’s termination on October 18 was “in full accordance with its explicit provisions.”
He added that all related restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program had now lapsed and that the Council’s involvement in Tehran’s peaceful nuclear activities had formally ended.
Araghchi said Iran had “implemented the JCPOA in good faith and with full precision” while the United States “grossly violated international law” by withdrawing in 2018 and reimposing unilateral sanctions.
The three European signatories, he wrote, “failed to meet their obligations and instead imposed additional unlawful measures.”
Referring to the European decision in August to trigger the deal’s snapback mechanism—which reimposed UN sanctions on Iran without the possibility of a veto—Araghchi called the move “unilateral and arbitrary” and said it had “no legal, procedural, or political basis.”
He warned that any claim to reinstate expired resolutions was “null and void.”
The same position was echoed on Saturday by Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei, who said Iran believes “no decision has been taken in the Security Council to bring back the lifted resolutions,” citing opposition from Russia, China, and several other Council members.
Moscow’s foreign ministry said Western efforts to restore UN sanctions were “legally null and void,” adding that after the expiration of Resolution 2231, Iran’s nuclear program should be treated like that of any other non-nuclear-weapon state under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov earlier described Iran’s acceptance of the snapback clause in 2015 as “a legal trap,” but said Moscow remained firmly committed to a political and diplomatic settlement of the dispute.
Iran has denied involvement in what Britain’s domestic intelligence service described as Iran-linked plots on UK soil, saying the accusations are unfounded and damage diplomatic relations.
MI5 Director-General Ken McCallum said on Thursday that British security agencies had disrupted more than 20 operations linked to Tehran in the past year and were stepping up efforts to counter what he called attempts by Iran to silence its opponents abroad. He said 2025 had required “a significant expansion of our counter-Iran effort,” citing what he described as a rise in hostile state activity.
The Iranian Embassy in London said on Friday it “strongly rejects” the statements, adding that Iran “denies any involvement in violent acts, kidnappings, or harassment of individuals in the UK or elsewhere.” It said the accusations were made without credible evidence and were “part of a continued effort to distort Iran’s policies and undermine bilateral diplomatic relations.”
The embassy said Iran “remains committed to international law, sovereign equality, and peaceful coexistence” and urged the British government to “refrain from escalating baseless accusations” and instead engage in “constructive dialogue based on mutual respect.”
British officials have said in recent months that Iran’s activities pose one of the most serious state-based threats to the UK, alongside those from Russia and China. The government has cited cyberattacks, surveillance, and the use of criminal networks to target dissidents as areas of concern.
McCallum’s comments followed a July parliamentary report that described Iran as a persistent and growing security challenge. The report said the UK and its allies faced what it called “a sustained campaign of intimidation and aggression” from Tehran.
Russia has long sought to prevent Iran from having normal relations with the world, former foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said, days after the Russian foreign minister faulted him for accepting a sanctions clause in a 2015 nuclear deal.
Speaking at a conference in Tehran, Zarif said Russia has two “red lines” in its policy toward Iran — that the country should never enjoy normal relations with the world and should also not enter direct confrontation. “That is why Russia supported the Geneva interim agreement. It kept the wound open but prevented conflict,” he said, according to the official IRNA news agency.
Lavrov said earlier this week that the snapback provision — which allows the rapid return of UN sanctions if Iran breaches the agreement — was “largely Zarif’s creation” and a “legal trap” for Tehran.
Zarif said the snapback clause was added during the final stage of nuclear talks as a substitute for a far worse proposal from Russia and France. “Mr Lavrov and the French had suggested a very bad plan on the status of previous UN Security Council resolutions, and we worked hard to replace it,” he said, according to the official IRNA news agency.
He said the final mechanism, later included in the 2015 nuclear deal and endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231, was designed to prevent any single country from using its veto to block or extend sanctions.
Hardliners in Iran have long criticized Zarif for accepting the JCPOA’s snapback mechanism, viewing it as a concession that enabled the reimposition of UN sanctions.
Last month, France, Germany and the United Kingdom triggered the snapback mechanism, restoring UN sanctions on Iran over its nuclear activities after they accused Tehran of blocking inspections and rejecting diplomacy. The move came despite opposition from Russia and China.
Long mistrust
In a leaked 2022 interview, Zarif said Russia had tried to prevent the 2015 deal from being finalized, adding that “Russia made every possible effort in the final week to stop the agreement from being concluded.”
Zarif also accused Moscow this week of disclosing sensitive information about Iran’s military and diplomatic activities, including General Qassem Soleimani’s visit to Moscow and details of Iranian drone supplies to Russia for the war in Ukraine. “They were the ones who made those public,” he said.
Lavrov has said Russia has always supported the nuclear deal and the UN Security Council resolution that endorsed it. He said the final decision on the JCPOA “was made directly by Zarif and Kerry” and that other participants, including Russia, were observers.
The United States withdrew from the deal in 2018 during first President Donald Trump’s administration. In response, Iran gradually reduced its compliance and in 2019 began enriching uranium at higher levels.
New Zealand said on Friday it would reimpose United Nations sanctions on Iran, citing Tehran’s failure to comply with its nuclear obligations under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, with the measures to take effect on October 18.
The measures respond to Iran’s continued non-compliance with the internationally recognized nuclear accord and will take effect on October 18, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said.
The sanctions restore restrictions on trade and travel, mirroring steps already taken by Britain, France and Germany, which last month reinstated UN penalties over similar breaches.
“This reimposition of UN-mandated sanctions reflects the international community’s deep concerns about Iran’s non-compliance with its nuclear obligations and unjustifiable levels of uranium enrichment activity,” Peters said.
In a confidential report leaked to reporters in September, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran's stock of near-weapons grade uranium had increased almost eight percent before Israel attacked its nuclear facilities on June 13.
The report shows Iran had 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%, marking a 7.9% increase since the UN nuclear watchdog’s previous report in May.
The statement by Peters outlined a range of restrictions including an asset freeze and travel bans on sanctioned persons, import and export bans on specified nuclear and military goods, and an obligation for New Zealanders to exercise vigilance in all dealings with Iran.
New Zealand “has consistently supported diplomatic efforts to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons from any source” and encouraged Tehran to “re-engage in negotiations and resume full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency,” Peters added.
The move aligns Wellington with Western allies that have intensified measures against Iran following recent findings by the IAEA indicating serious safeguards violations and rising uranium enrichment.
New Zealand will introduce a compulsory registration scheme for citizens doing business with Iran from February 1, 2026, Peters said.
Iranian state-linked hackers are expanding their cyber operations beyond the Middle East to include targets in North America and Europe, according to Microsoft’s 2025 Digital Defense Report published on Thursday.
"Recently, three Iranian state-affiliated actors attacked shipping and logistics firms in Europe and the Persian Gulf to gain ongoing access to sensitive commercial data, raising the possibility that Iran may be pre-positioning to have the ability to interfere with commercial shipping operations," the report said.
In response, Iran’s mission to the United Nations denied the allegation, saying Tehran “is not the initiator of any offensive cyber operations against any country.”
The mission said Iran is a victim of cyberattacks itself and “will respond to any cyber threat in proportion to its nature and scope.”
Microsoft's report comes just days after Britain’s MI5 warned members of Parliament that spies from China, Russia and Iran are targeting UK politicians in an effort to influence policy, gather intelligence and undermine democracy.
On Tuesday, MI5 Director General Ken McCallum urged lawmakers to stay alert to blackmail attempts, phishing attacks, and approaches from individuals seeking to cultivate long-term relationships or make donations to sway decisions.
FBI director Kash Patel on Wednesday said the United States has seen a 50% increase in espionage cases linked to Iran.
US security agencies had warned in July of increased risk from Iranian cyber actors.
“Based on the current geopolitical environment, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors may target US devices and networks for near-term cyber operations,” the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) said in the report, issued jointly with the National Security Agency (NSA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and FBI.