Iran lodges UN complaint accusing Musk's Starlink of operating illegally
A starlink dish in Tehran, Iran.
Iran submitted a formal complaint to the United Nations International Telecommunication Union (ITU) over the unauthorized provision of Starlink satellite services within its territory last month amid the country's war with Israel.
Revolutionary Guards-affiliated Fars News reported Wednesday that Iran’s Ministry of Communications sent the complaint in a letter dated June 23 to the ITU’s Radio Regulations Board.
The report included a copy of the letter, which alleges that Starlink operated in Iran without the required license.
The complaint follows Starlink’s activation in Iran during the 12-day war with Israel last month, when Iranian authorities imposed widespread internet shutdowns.
On June 14, Starlink’s founder Elon Musk confirmed on X that “the beams are on,” indicating the satellite service was active inside Iran.
Starlink's role in Iran has grown significantly over recent years. The number of its users in the country has now surpassed 100,000, according to Pouya Pirhosseinlou, head of the Internet and Infrastructure Committee at Iran’s E-Commerce Association.
"Over 30,000 unique users are utilizing satellite internet, suggesting that the total number of satellite internet users exceeds 100,000," Pirhosseinlou told Iran's ILNA news agency earlier this year.
Despite being officially prohibited in Iran, Starlink’s appeal lies in its unrestricted access and high-speed service—an alternative to the heavily filtered and controlled local internet where Iran ranks among the world's lowest for internet freedom, according to Freedom House.
Last weekend, Iran's judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir said authorities would take legal action against individuals and entities using Starlink.
According to a new proposed espionage-related bill, penalties ranging from six months to 10 years would apply to the use or distribution of unauthorized communication equipment, including satellite internet services like Starlink, depending on scale and intent.
Yemeni forces fighting the Iran-backed Houthi movement have carried out their largest ever seizure of advanced Iranian conventional weapons bound for the group, US Central Command (CENTCOM) said on Wednesday.
CENTCOM said the National Resistance Forces (NRF) confiscated over 750 tons of advanced weaponry including anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles, warheads, hundreds of drone engines, air defense equipment, radar systems and communications equipment.
The NRF is an anti-Houthi force led by General Tareq Saleh, nephew of Yemen’s former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, and operates independently of the internationally recognized government.
CENTCOM added that many of the systems were manufactured by a company affiliated with Iran’s defense ministry and included manuals in Farsi.
“We commend the legitimate government forces of Yemen who continue to interdict the flow of Iranian munitions bound for the Houthis," General Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of CENTCOM said in a statement.
"The interdiction of this massive Iranian shipment shows that Iran remains the most destabilizing actor in the region. Limiting the free flow of Iranian support to the Houthis is critic to regional security, stability, and freedom of navigation,” he added.
Since the outbreak of the Gaza war, Yemen’s Houthis have launched missiles, rockets, and drones toward Israel and enforced a maritime disruption in the Red Sea, in what it describes as support for Palestinians in Gaza.
Last month, the group's rivals in Yemeni government said that Iran is transferring parts of its military industry, including ballistic missile and drone production to Houthi-controlled areas in Saada, Hajjah, and the outskirts of Sanaa.
The Houthis resumed attacks on the high seas following a June 24 ceasefire ending a 12-day war between Israel and Iran.
Houthi forces sank a Liberian-flagged carrier on July 6 with rockets and explosive drone boats. The group, which controls most of Yemen's population centers, says its maritime attacks are in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.
Israel launched a national media campaign on Wednesday warning citizens against spying for Iran, cautioning that cooperating with Tehran could lead to imprisonment.
Israeli authorities say they have uncovered more than 25 cases of Iranian recruitment over the past year, with more than 35 people indicted on serious security charges.
“The campaign carries significant national importance, especially in the aftermath of (the war with Iran), after which Iranian efforts to recruit operatives and execute missions inside Israel are expected to intensify,” said Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate, which along with domestic security service the Shin Bet is behind the campaign.
“For 5,000 shekels, is it worth ruining your life or family?” reads one of the campaign's video ads, referencing the reported amounts some individuals have received for passing information to Tehran.
“Easy money, heavy cost – don’t help the Iranian enemy,” another message warns, saying that cooperating with Iran can lead to imprisonment of up to 15 years.
The warnings come after Israel last month fought a 12-day war with Iran, a conflict sparked by rising tensions over Tehran’s nuclear program.
In February, two army reservists were caught allegedly passing classified information on the country’s Iron Dome defense system to an Iranian operative.
Iranian state media on Wednesday announced the death of a senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander five days after the death of top figure who also helped oversee the Islamic Republic’s suppression of protests.
The death of Gholamhossein Gheybparvar, deputy commander at the Revolutionary Guards’ Imam Ali base was attributed to “illness caused by chemical injuries” from the Iran-Iraq war which ended in 1988.
No such condition had been previously disclosed, and in a visit last month to the northern Iranian city of Qazvin he wore a face mask but appeared otherwise healthy.
Known by the alias Shahram, Gheybparvar held prominent roles across IRGC institutions involved in domestic crackdowns.
Gheybparvar (first from the right) seen during a meeting reported from Qazvin on May 26, 2025. He is not carrying any respiratory equipment in this appearance — despite the fact that chemical warfare victims typically rely on such support in the final years of life.
Gheybparvar headed the domestic militia the Basij from 2016 to 2019, overseeing paramilitary confrontations with protestors and was appointed deputy chief of the Imam Ali base the same year.
The Imam Ali base commands battalions formed in 2011 under then-president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Its units—often clad in black or camouflage—have appeared in nearly every nationwide protest since, engaging directly in beatings and detentions.
Ali Taeb, former representative of the Supreme Leader in the Tharallah Headquarters
Their operations are supported by the Sarallah base, which oversees security over the capital Tehran and which was targeted in Israeli attacks last month.
Ali Taeb, another key security figure whose death was announced last week, served as Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's former representative at the base. His brother Hossein Taeb once led the Revolutionary Guard’s Intelligence Organization.
Taeb’s death, reported on Friday, was announced just hours after a gas explosion at a residential high-rise in western Tehran. State media said Taeb died of natural causes.
Israel’s 12-day military campaign against Iran began on June 13, targeting not only bases and nuclear sites but also top-ranking military and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials.
Israeli airstrikes and drone attacks killed hundreds of Iranian military personnel and nuclear scientists, as well as hundreds of civilians. In response, Iranian missile salvos killed 27 Israeli civilians.
Iran’s parliament on Wednesday demanded that the government halt all new negotiations with the United States unless strict preconditions are met, citing what lawmakers called Washington’s use of diplomacy as cover for military escalation.
“When the US uses negotiations as a tool to deceive Iran and to cover for sudden military attacks by the Zionist regime, talks cannot continue as before,” members of parliament said in a joint statement read during an open session by MP Ahmad Naderi, according to state media.
While the tone of the statement points to demands such as security assurances, respect for sovereignty, and a fundamental change in US conduct, lawmakers did not outline any specific or actionable preconditions.
The declaration came one day after US President Donald Trump said he was in “no rush” to resume talks and pointed to last month’s airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as leverage. “They would like to talk. I’m in no rush to talk because we obliterated their site,” Trump said Tuesday.
Parliament says no new talks without guarantees
The lawmakers said any new diplomatic engagement must be conditional and guided by Iran’s top leadership. “Preconditions must be established, and until they are fully met, no new negotiations should take place,” they said.
They accused the US of deliberately using the appearance of diplomacy to enable Israeli military action and warned that Iran would no longer engage under the same terms. “The American president, while pretending to favor diplomacy, authorized a direct attack on our nuclear infrastructure,” the statement said.
Lawmakers framed the issue as part of a larger campaign to undermine Iran’s sovereignty. “The goal is to weaken and divide the country,” they said. “But our response must be unity under the commands of the Supreme Leader.”
Iran faces pressure as Europe moves toward snapback
The warning came amid growing pressure from the US and its European allies, who on Monday set an end-of-August deadline for Iran to return to the nuclear deal or face the reimposition of full UN sanctions under the JCPOA’s snapback mechanism, Axios reported.
The snapback mechanism, created under UN Security Council Resolution 2231—which endorsed the 2015 nuclear deal—allows any party to the agreement to reimpose sanctions if Iran is found non-compliant. If no resolution is passed within 30 days to continue sanctions relief, all prior UN measures automatically come back into force.
The US, France, Britain, and Germany said Iran could avoid snapback only by providing new assurances over its nuclear activities. A US official told Axios that Trump was frustrated by Iran’s refusal to return to talks and wants any future discussions to be direct.
“The snapback is leverage,” the official said. “And Witkoff has told the Iranians clearly: no intermediaries this time.”
Parliament defends law limiting IAEA access
In the statement, Iranian lawmakers also defended their recent vote to restrict cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, saying it was a response to security threats following the June airstrikes.
“The Parliament of Iran has voted for a halt to collaboration with the IAEA until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed,” the lawmakers said.
Tehran says it has not ended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency despite the new legislation. Instead, future coordination with inspectors will be managed by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said earlier this month.
“Iran remains committed to the NPT and its Safeguards Agreement,” Araghchi wrote on X, rejecting reports of a full suspension as “fake news.”
He said the shift in procedure was necessary due to rising security concerns. “Under the new law, all cooperation with the IAEA must go through the Supreme National Security Council,” he wrote.
Lawmakers target IAEA and Western states
Iranian lawmakers accused the IAEA of legitimizing military aggression by sharing sensitive information with hostile governments. They also criticized Germany and other European states for backing US and Israeli actions.
“The IAEA and its partners must understand that until Iran is assured of no further violations, no new information will be handed to spies and aggressors,” the statement said.
The IAEA said inspectors remain in the country and await clarification from Tehran. But tensions have continued to rise, with a senior Iranian judicial official recently threatening the IAEA chief with trial in absentia.
Iran signals no retreat from enrichment
The Pentagon said last month’s strikes had degraded Iran’s nuclear program by up to two years. “We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said.
Araghchi confirmed “serious and heavy damage” to the Fordow facility but said Iran would not halt enrichment. “Enrichment is a matter of national pride and glory,” he said.
Lawmakers echoed that stance. “We will not allow anyone to use the language of pressure and expect submission,” they said. “Diplomacy is not surrender—it is another front in the war.”
The United States is in no hurry to enter talks with Iran, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday, pointing to last month’s American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as a source of leverage.
“They would like to talk. I’m in no rush to talk because we obliterated their site,” Trump told reporters.
The US president made the remarks shortly after returning from Pittsburgh, adding that Washington remained in control of the diplomatic timeline.
Iranian lawmakers responded Wednesday by urging the government to set firm preconditions before entering any new negotiations with the United States.
“When the US uses negotiations as a tool to deceive Iran and to cover for sudden military attacks by the Zionist regime, talks cannot continue as before,” a statement read during parliament’s open session said, according to state media.
The declaration called for a fundamental shift in Iran’s approach to diplomatic engagement. “Preconditions must be established, and until they are fully met, no new negotiations should take place,” the statement said.
Axios reported Tuesday that Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy for Middle East affairs, had conveyed a message to Iranian officials: any future discussions must take place directly, without intermediaries.
“Witkoff has made it clear to the Iranians that any future talks must be direct, rather than mediated by a third party, to avoid misunderstandings and expedite the process,” the outlet quoted a senior US official as saying.
Iran’s foreign ministry has not confirmed any progress toward such talks. Spokesman Esmail Baghaei said Monday that no time or location had been agreed for a meeting between Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Witkoff.
“So long as we are not assured of the effectiveness of diplomacy and the negotiation process, we will not enter such a process,” Baghaei said.