Iran says US must clarify sanctions relief in nuclear talks
Iran’s Foreign Ministry said on Monday that the United States has yet to provide clear assurances on lifting sanctions, a key condition for any nuclear agreement between Tehran and Washington.
“It must be clear to us how the oppressive sanctions against the Iranian people will be lifted, to ensure that past experiences are not repeated,” Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters in Tehran.
"I regret to inform you that the American side has not yet been willing to clarify this issue," Baghaei said at his weekly press.
The White House ordered a freeze on new sanctions activity on Iran last week, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, pausing President Donald Trump’s so-called maximum pressure campaign against Tehran.
Oman's Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad al-Busaidi visited Tehran on Saturday to deliver what Iran described as "elements of a US proposal" related to a possible nuclear agreement.
Muscat has been mediating between Iran and the United States as the two countries seek a breakthrough following five rounds of indirect talks last held in Rome this month.
US proposal under review
Baghaei emphasized that receiving a written text from the US did not signal any agreement on Iran's part.
"Certainly, receiving a text does not mean it is accepted, nor even that it is acceptable," he said. "Exchange of documents is a common practice in all negotiation processes."
Any proposal, Baghaei added, containing “radical and maximalist demands” which ignores what he called the legitimate rights and interests of the Iranian people would not receive a positive response from Tehran.
“The red lines of Iran will be the basis for our response to the American proposal,” he said, underlining the centrality of Iran’s uranium enrichment program and the demand for effective lifting of sanctions.
Iran accuses IAEA of bias
Baghaei also addressed the latest report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), saying it was prepared under pressure from certain Western countries.
“The report contains mostly repetitive content, and some technical matters have been exaggerated,” he said. “We are certain that this report was prepared under pressure from specific countries.”
Documents seen by the IAEA showed that Iran carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the UN nuclear watchdog at three locations which have long been under investigation, Reuters reported last week.
Baghaei criticized what he described as a long-standing pattern of Western states using international organizations for political purposes. “Unfortunately, this has become an undesirable trend over the past two decades,” he added.
He said that Iran’s nuclear activities remain under full monitoring by the agency and warned against misrepresenting internal procedural issues—such as revoking the accreditation of a few inspectors—while ignoring the continued presence of 125 active inspectors in the country.
Israel using nuclear issue to sway US policy, Iran says
Responding to longstanding allegations that Iran seeks to develop nuclear weapons, Baghaei argued that such claims have been used politically by Israel to influence US foreign policy.
“If you review the reports on Iran’s nuclear issue, you will see that since 1984, officials from the Zionist regime have claimed that Iran would obtain a nuclear bomb within six months,” he said. “It’s been nearly 40 years. The peaceful nature of our nuclear program has been consistently proven.”
He added, “Israel’s concern is not about a nuclear Iran, but about losing its ability to impose its will in the region and control US foreign policy.”
No clarity from US yet
Baghaei said that Iran’s key demand remains the complete and verifiable removal of economic sanctions.
“In the nuclear field, the matter is clear to us. If America’s concern is the absence of nuclear weapons, that issue is already resolved,” he said. “What matters is ensuring the real and observable end of the sanctions imposed over the past decades.”
He explained that Iran seeks to see practical outcomes, including improvements in banking, trade, and economic relations.
“This is a clear contradiction in the US approach,” Baghaei said. “On one hand, they claim to support diplomacy, but on the other, they reinforce the very obstacles that prevent any understanding.”
He said Iran regards any new sanctions as “a sign of the lack of seriousness and real intent on the part of the United States to advance diplomatic efforts.”
On the potential activation of the “snapback” mechanism—formally known as the dispute resolution process under the 2015 nuclear deal—Baghaei warned, “We have anticipated multiple scenarios. If such a mechanism is triggered by European signatories, we will respond in kind and appropriately.”
Consortium cannot replace enrichment inside Iran
Baghaei also said that any proposal to replace Iran's domestic uranium enrichment with a multinational consortium is unacceptable.
“This idea is not new, and it’s not surprising that negotiating parties continue to raise it. But the consortium proposal can in no way replace enrichment on Iranian soil.”
Baghaei added that while Iran is willing to participate in such initiatives, it would not consider any arrangement that undermines what Tehran sees as its sovereign right under international law.
Iran remains under global sanctions not only for its nuclear program but also over its human rights record at home, and supporting Russia's war on Ukraine. The situation has left Iran's economy in its worst state since the founding of the Islamic Republic in 1979.
The United States and Egypt discussed Washington's negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrived in Cairo on Sunday.
US President Donald Trump’s special envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, spoke with Egypt’s Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty on Sunday evening, according to an official Egyptian readout.
Abdelatty expressed Cairo’s support for the talks, saying, “The US-Iranian talks represent a critical opportunity to achieve calm and de-escalation in the region and prevent its slide into total chaos.”
Araghchi arrived in Cairo on Sunday for talks with senior Egyptian officials focusing on bilateral relations.
On Monday, Araghchi met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Cairo.
Earlier in the day, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said that during Araghchi’s visit to Egypt, the foreign minister may discuss ongoing indirect negotiations with the United States.
Responding to reports of a planned meeting between Araghchi and IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi in Egypt, Baghaei said the meeting “cannot be confirmed.”
The White House has issued a directive to pause all new sanctions activity toward Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, citing a source close to the administration.
According to the report, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued the order last week, halting measures that had been part of President Donald Trump’s ongoing "maximum pressure" campaign.
The directive was passed to senior officials at the National Security Council, the Treasury Department, and the State Department, the report said.
While the White House did not deny the sanctions pause, deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement to the Journal: “Any new decisions with regard to sanctions will be announced by the White House or relevant agencies within the administration.”
The report said that Trump officials view the move as a temporary slowdown aimed at reviewing potential sanctions more carefully amid sensitive nuclear negotiations, and that it was overinterpreted somewhere along the chain.
Others expressed concern that key policymakers have been out of the loop and surprised by the sweeping pause.
A senior Iranian lawmaker warned on Sunday that Tehran should not sign a deal similar to the 2003 Saadabad Agreement with world powers, which suspended its enrichment program and allowed snap UN inspections.
Abolfazl Zohrehvand, a member of the Iranian parliament's national security and foreign policy committee, said the 2003 agreement, which led to the Tehran Declaration, was a "strategic mistake" that should not be repeated.
In October 2003, Iran agreed to suspend uranium enrichment and permit enhanced inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to demonstrate the peaceful nature of its nuclear program and avoid referral to the United Nations Security Council.
The agreement was signed by Iran's then-Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Hassan Rouhani, along with the foreign ministers of the United Kingdom, France, and Germany at Tehran's Saadabad Palace. It temporarily averted escalation of the nuclear dispute.
However, following the election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005, Iran resumed uranium conversion activities at the Isfahan facility in August 2005 and enrichment at the Natanz facility in early 2006. By April 2006, Iran announced it had successfully enriched uranium to a purity level of approximately 3.5%, marking a significant advancement in its nuclear capabilities.
Zohrehvand said in an interview with Didban Iran that Tehran agreed in 2003 to suspend enrichment, signed the Saadabad agreement, and fulfilled its commitments by sealing the Natanz enrichment facility and the yellowcake production facility in Isfahan.
However, despite several rounds of negotiations, Iran’s request for reciprocal measures from the West went unmet, he added.
He said during that period, President Mohammad Khatami had tried to formally transfer a centrifuge to Tehran University to demonstrate Iran’s mastery of centrifuge technology. However, he said, then-Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi contacted British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw to coordinate the move, only to be told it was not permitted and that all centrifuges had to be dismantled.
Zohrehvand also noted that following a visit to Tehran, the German foreign minister went directly to Israel and announced, “We told the Iranians to dismantle their enrichment program entirely.”
According to Zohrehvand, today’s Western demands echo the same expectations as those of two decades ago.
“This same model is being repeated again,” he warned.
Zohrehvand said while a temporary suspension of enrichment in return for sanctions relief might now be acceptable, it would be naïve to believe that the United States would be satisfied with such a deal.
“If resolving the issue merely means suspending or halting enrichment, it could happen—there’s no problem with suspending enrichment for a few years in exchange for the suspension or lifting of sanctions,” Zohrehvand said.
“But believing that the Americans would be content with that is simplistic.”
Hardliners in Iran are warning world powers of costly consequences if United Nations sanctions are revived ahead of an October deadline, as Western capitals weigh triggering the so-called snapback mechanism under the 2015 nuclear deal.
A commentary published Sunday by Tasnim News, an outlet affiliated with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, accused Britain, France and Germany of “blackmailing” Iran by threatening to invoke the snapback clause of a 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.
The so-called snapback of UN sanctions on Iran can technically be restored automatically if any party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) deems Iran to be non-compliant with the deal.
“Much of the Europeans’ audacity stems from their perceived ability to trigger the snapback clause,” the article said. “Increasing the cost of their strategic choices is the only viable countermeasure.”
The conservative daily Khorasan struck a similar tone, warning Western powers that any military action or invocation of the snapback clause would provoke a fundamental shift in Iran’s defense doctrine. The paper said Iran could produce 10 atomic bombs and that its intercontinental ballistic missile capability should not be underestimated.
“If the snapback mechanism is activated, it means all of Iran’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEAI) has yielded nothing,” the editorial said.
All eyes on IAEA Board
The UN nuclear watchdog on Saturday confirmed that Iran’s stockpile of 60% enriched uranium now exceeds 400 kg—enough for developing 10 nuclear weapons if further enriched. It also accused Tehran of running a secret nuclear program using unreported material.
The findings have convinced the United States, Britain, France, and Germany to submit a draft resolution on Iran non-compliance for adoption by the agency’s board at its upcoming meeting during the week of June 9, diplomats said Saturday.
The last time the IAEA Board formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation commitments in 2005, it led to Iran’s referral to the UN Security Council and triggered a round of international sanctions.
Iran's warning
Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on Saturday spoke by phone with the IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, warning against political pressure on the nuclear watchdog ahead of its board meeting.
“Iran will respond appropriately to any improper moves by European parties,” Araghchi said.
“The responsibility for any fallout will lie with those who use the Agency and its mechanisms as tools to advance their political agenda against Iran.”
Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization and foreign ministry dismissed the IAEA’s new report, accusing the agency of relying on “forged Israeli documents.”
Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also condemned the report as a Western effort to reopen previously settled issues, saying it was “based on a series of fabricated data provided by the Zionist regime.”
US proposal
Iran and the United States are now engaged in diplomatic talks aimed at clinching a deal that would curb Iran's nuclear program and provide some sanction relief for Tehran.
Washington has floated proposals aimed at breaking the deadlock in nuclear talks with Iran. Axios reported over the weekend that the US is considering recognizing Iran’s right to uranium enrichment in exchange for a suspension of enrichment or the creation of a regional fuel consortium.
The idea was shared with Iran in a proposal from US President Donald Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, relayed via Oman’s foreign minister during a brief visit to Tehran on Saturday.
Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran would respond in line with its “national interests and rights,” but officials made clear that enrichment will remain central to Iran’s nuclear posture—regardless of pressure or inducement.
Enrichment a red line for Tehran
Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament's national security committee, said, “Enrichment is a national value and a symbol of independence ... No negotiation over the principle of enrichment is meaningful."
Another lawmaker, Vahid Ahmadi, raised the possibility of a temporary nuclear deal with the United States while indirect talks continue if there is a softening on American demands to totally halt uranium enrichment.
“If the Americans show some retreat in their stance, there is a possibility of reaching a temporary understanding,” he said in remarks published by ISNA. However, he insisted that “there is no way we will accept shutting down enrichment.”
Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state enriching uranium to 60% U-235, a level that causes "serious concern," according to Grossi.
The IAEA has consistently maintained that there is no credible civilian use for uranium enriched to this level, which is a short technical step from weapons-grade 90% fissile material.
Iran has strongly rejected as unbalanced and politically motivated the latest report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which accuses Tehran of running an undeclared nuclear program using unreported material.
Details of the UN nuclear watchdog's report were released by Reuters earlier in the day, at a delicate moment as Tehran and Washington have engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations in recent weeks over a potential nuclear agreement that US President Donald Trump is seeking to finalize.
In a joint statement on Saturday, the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) accused IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi of "repeating groundless accusations based on forged documents provided by the Zionist regime (Israel)."
“The allegations raised by the IAEA are based on claims regarding a handful of undeclared activities and locations from decades ago,” the statement read. “Iran has repeatedly declared that it has never had any undeclared nuclear site or activity.”
In 2018, Israel officially claimed responsibility for the theft of Iran's nuclear documents from a warehouse in Tehran's Shourabad area – with Benjamin Netanyahu revealing that Israel had obtained 55,000 pages and 55,000 digital files through an intelligence operation.
Iran's Saturday statement condemned what it called the IAEA’s double standards regarding Israel. “The report relies on unverified information from a regime that is not even a party to the NPT, possesses nuclear weapons, and openly threatens Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities"
The statement also criticized the IAEA's report for failing to accurately reflect Iran’s cooperation with the Agency. “Despite acknowledging Iran’s cooperation, the report does not portray the real level of engagement. Iran has provided access, allowed sampling, and offered extensive explanations on the sites in question."
Tehran accused Western powers of exploiting the Agency for political ends. “The United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany have repeatedly violated their commitments under the JCPOA and Resolution 2231. At the same time, they continue to impose illegal sanctions and pressure Iran in violation of international law.”
Sharp rise in highly enriched uranium stockpiles
The IAEA, in a separate report sent to member states on Saturday, revealed a sharp rise in Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium. As of May 17, Iran held 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent, an increase of 133.8 kilograms since February, the report said. Material enriched to that level is a short technical step from weapons-grade purity.
The Iranian government on Saturday stressed the peaceful nature of its nuclear program and reaffirmed its intention to continue working with the Agency within the framework of its legal obligations.
“Iran’s enrichment program is exclusively for peaceful purposes, under full IAEA oversight and in line with the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement,” the statement added.
Iran warned that any attempt to use the report against it during the upcoming Board of Governors meeting would trigger a response.
“Should some states misuse the report or Iran’s transparent cooperation to increase pressure, the Islamic Republic will take appropriate measures to protect its legitimate rights and interests,” the statement said.