Iranian MP links delay in US talks to possible IAEA interference

Senior Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei on Saturday accused US President Donald Trump and his advisers of confusion in their foreign policy approach, saying Tehran has shown seriousness in negotiations but remains fully prepared for any scenario.

Rezaei, a member of Iran’s Expediency Council and former commander of the Revolutionary Guards, was responding to a recent post by Donald Trump Jr. defending Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff against criticism from Washington insiders.

“Before entering the White House, Trump claimed he had plans to end wars immediately, even within 24 hours,” Rezaei wrote on X. “But the war in Ukraine continues, ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon have collapsed, and the Israeli army occupies parts of Syria.”

He added: “Iran has shown its seriousness and readiness to negotiate and reach an agreement. But Trump and his team, influenced by Netanyahu and the neocons, remain in confusion.”

Rezaei concluded by warning that “Iran is prepared for every scenario. Confrontation with Iran would have dire consequences for the United States.”

Iran’s currency fell sharply on Saturday after a planned fourth round of indirect talks with the United States was postponed, as sharp disagreements over uranium enrichment and inspections cast doubt on prospects for a breakthrough.

The rial dropped past 870,000 to the US dollar in Tehran’s open market, reversing gains made earlier last month during previous rounds of diplomacy in Oman. The currency had recovered to around 795,000 following the third round but slid again amid rising uncertainty.

Read more here.

A member of Iran’s parliament said the administration of former President Ebrahim Raisi engaged in nuclear negotiations but deliberately withheld information from the public to avoid market volatility.

“The Raisi government also negotiated, but didn’t tell the people,” said Meysam Zohourian, a member of the parliament’s Economic Commission, in remarks published Saturday. “Talks happened, but society wasn’t aware, so it didn’t become psychologically conditioned to the negotiation climate.”

Zohourian argued that the secrecy helped prevent the currency market from reacting to shifts in the diplomatic process. “Progress or failure in talks didn’t affect the exchange rate because the government didn’t socialize the negotiation process,” he said.

He added that withholding information helped manage public expectations. “People didn’t know who had come or gone, and that lack of awareness kept expectations in check.”

Russia’s ambassador to international organizations in Vienna expressed support for Iran’s nuclear stance on Saturday, saying Tehran is entitled to the full nuclear fuel cycle under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

“Minister Araghchi is absolutely right,” Mikhail Ulyanov wrote on X. “Under the NPT, States Parties don’t only take some basic obligations, but also get some basic rights that can’t be questioned.”

Ulyanov reposted comments made earlier by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who warned that “maximalist positioning and incendiary rhetoric” from the US was undermining progress in ongoing nuclear talks.

Araghchi wrote, “Iran has every right to possess the full nuclear fuel cycle as a founding signatory to the NPT,” adding that other countries enrich uranium while rejecting nuclear weapons, including several in Asia, Europe, and South America.

The exchange came amid heightened tensions following US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s remarks that Iran must end enrichment and allow full American inspections to avoid serious consequences, including possible military action.

A senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader said Saturday that the outcome of ongoing indirect negotiations with the United States depends on whether global powers act with “fairness and rationality.”

Ali Larijani, a former parliament speaker and close aide to Ali Khamenei, said the diplomatic process may or may not succeed, depending on how the current world order is managed.

“These talks may succeed, or they may not. It depends on whether there is fairness and rationality in how global affairs are conducted,” Larijani said.

He added that while international rules are often presented as multilateral, power dynamics ultimately drive outcomes. “Many global regulations are outwardly backed by international institutions, but behind them lies power,” he said.

“Right now, the Americans believe they must enforce their power,” he added, referring to what he described as Washington’s unilateral approach.

The remarks come as indirect nuclear talks between Iran and the US remain in limbo, following the postponement of a fourth round scheduled in Rome.

Larijani also said that Iran did not create groups like Hezbollah or Hamas, and dismissed the idea that Tehran relies on regional proxies.

“Did we create Hezbollah? No. It started when Israel occupied Beirut,” Larijani said. “They say Iran has armed branches — Iran doesn’t need armed branches.”

Referring to Israeli statements about Hamas, he said: “If Hamas has been destroyed, then whom are you exchanging prisoners with?”