• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
ANALYSIS

Could Iran be building a Chinese-style internet system?

Negar Mojtahedi
Negar Mojtahedi

Iran International

May 26, 2026, 04:04 GMT+1
Children look at a mobile device among spring tulips in a flower garden in Tabriz, northwestern Iran, May 24, 2026
Children look at a mobile device among spring tulips in a flower garden in Tabriz, northwestern Iran, May 24, 2026

Iran may be moving beyond temporary internet blackouts toward something more durable: a Chinese-style system of digital control.

Concerns intensified after a former head of Iran’s state broadcaster said Tehran had imported Chinese equipment for a “permanent internet shutdown,” while millions of Iranians endure what monitoring group NetBlocks says is now the world’s longest ongoing nationwide blackout.

Experts warn the Islamic Republic may not be trying to shut the internet off forever but instead attempting to build a controlled and heavily surveilled online ecosystem designed to filter information, monitor communications and isolate Iranians from the outside world while still keeping parts of the economy online.

Mohammad Sarafraz, the former head of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and a current member of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace, said in an interview with the online newspaper Faraz that factions in Tehran are seeking to restrict global internet access for the general public while preserving it for a limited and controlled group.

He said the Islamic Republic had imported Chinese equipment for “permanently cutting off the internet.”

Spectre of digital control

Laura Edelson, assistant professor of computer science at Northeastern University, said the closest comparison may be China’s internet crackdown in Xinjiang after unrest there in 2009, when authorities isolated the Uyghur-majority region from the outside internet for 10 months.

“Functionally, for the vast majority of the population, they were effectively cut off entirely from the outside world,” Edelson said.

She said China’s model is far more sophisticated than simply blocking websites, relying on centralized state control to filter content, surveil users and selectively determine what information people can access.

“This centralized model is one that a lot of other countries, including and almost especially Iran, has been moving toward,” she told Iran International.

She added that turning off the internet forever “is not useful,” meaning authoritarian governments increasingly favor adaptable systems that can tighten restrictions during politically sensitive moments and loosen them when economic activity is needed.

“Iran’s government doesn’t trust its own people,” Edelson said. “The vast majority of people don't support the government.”

“If you can have an internet that you can adaptively not just turn on and off, but control what people can reach and what they can’t reach — that’s a set of internet censorship and surveillance systems that I would be more afraid of personally,” she said.

Can Tehran pull it off?

Max Meizlish, Senior Research Analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former US Treasury official focused on sanctions enforcement, said China has long exported censorship technologies and surveillance capabilities to authoritarian partners.

“We know that China has been a significant partner to several malign actors, including Iran, but also Russia and North Korea, with respect to cyber technology censorship capabilities,” Meizlish told Iran International.

He said China’s own internet system gives Tehran both a blueprint and a commercial partner.

According to Meizlish, Iran’s centralized control over internet infrastructure already gives authorities the ability to regulate what information enters or leaves the country.

“What we could actually see is Iran building out its own internet,” he said, “so that the people of Iran are only able to view what the government wants them to view.”

He said technology transfers between Beijing and Tehran should increasingly be viewed through the lens of human rights abuses and digital repression.

“There’s an argument to be made that this form of censorship constitutes a wide-scale human rights abuse,” Meizlish said.

But Amin Sabeti, founder of cybersecurity research group CERTFA, cautioned that Iran still lacks many of the domestic technological capabilities that made China’s censorship system possible.

“The Iranian regime imports the technology; it doesn't own the technology,” Sabeti said.

Unlike China, he said, Iran lacks strong domestic alternatives to many global services and remains heavily dependent on foreign infrastructure and technology.

“In China, there isn't a need for Gmail because they have good services in terms of email,” Sabeti said. “In Iran, there isn't any proper email service.”

Sabeti said Iran has repeatedly shown it can temporarily shut down the internet during protests and unrest, but questioned whether the regime could sustain a truly permanent nationwide blackout over the long term.

“I don't think it will happen,” he said.

Iran’s rulers may not want to permanently disconnect Iranians from the global internet, but they appear to be moving toward a more sustainable architecture of digital control that allows the state to keep commerce functioning while isolating citizens from independent information, encrypted communications and even family members abroad.

For many Iranians, the question is no longer whether the internet will fully return, but what kind of internet the state intends to allow back.

Most Viewed

Iran demands access to $12B in Qatar funds as precondition for US MoU
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran demands access to $12B in Qatar funds as precondition for US MoU

2

Iran executes another political prisoner, bringing tally to 37 since March

3
ANALYSIS

Iran is turning the internet into a privilege

4
VOICES FROM IRAN

Citizens voice anger, distrust over possible US-Iran deal

5
OPINION

Trump vs Tehran: how not signing became the deal

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Could Iran be building a Chinese-style internet system?
    ANALYSIS

    Could Iran be building a Chinese-style internet system?

  • Oil pressure and economic strain drive Iran-US talks
    ANALYSIS

    Oil pressure and economic strain drive Iran-US talks

  • Qatar emerges as key broker in US-Iran frozen funds dispute
    INSIGHT

    Qatar emerges as key broker in US-Iran frozen funds dispute

  • Trump vs Tehran: how not signing became the deal
    OPINION

    Trump vs Tehran: how not signing became the deal

  • Iran is turning the internet into a privilege
    ANALYSIS

    Iran is turning the internet into a privilege

•
•
•

More Stories

Oil pressure and economic strain drive Iran-US talks

May 26, 2026, 01:02 GMT+1
•
Dalga Khatinoglu

More than six weeks after Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and the United States moved to enforce a naval blockade, the confrontation increasingly appears to be entering a new phase: negotiations driven by exhaustion.

What began as a military and geopolitical standoff has evolved into a contest over economic endurance, one that neither Iran nor the global economy appears capable of sustaining indefinitely.

After weeks of escalation, diplomacy has regained momentum. Talks involving Tehran, Washington and regional mediators have intensified, while US President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested a deal may be close.

At the center of the latest negotiations lies the issue of frozen Iranian assets.

Iranian officials are demanding guaranteed access to billions of dollars held abroad before accepting any preliminary understanding, while reports from Tehran suggest Qatar may be exploring financial mechanisms that would allow limited transfers without direct US payments to Iran.

The diplomacy reflects mounting pressure on both sides.

The head of the International Energy Agency warned in May that unless progress is made toward ending the crisis with Iran, the global oil market could enter a “red zone” by summer.

Beginning in mid-March — roughly two weeks after Iran moved to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz — IEA member states began gradually releasing strategic petroleum reserves to offset sharp declines in Gulf energy exports.

Hundreds of millions of barrels have already been released from emergency stockpiles, according to market estimates, as governments attempt to stabilize prices and prevent a broader supply shock.

But strategic reserves are not unlimited.

Even when commercial inventories are included, only part of global oil storage can realistically be released to the market. Much of the world’s inventories are tied to operational infrastructure, while many governments face legal and political constraints on how deeply emergency reserves can be depleted outside wartime conditions.

The strain is increasingly visible across the global economy.

High energy prices have weakened demand growth and raised recession fears in major economies, while shipping disruptions in the Persian Gulf continue to inject volatility into global markets.

Iran, meanwhile, faces mounting economic pressure of its own.

Exports of crude oil and petroleum products, which account for a large share of the country’s export revenues, have sharply declined under blockade conditions. Iranian steel and petrochemical facilities have also faced repeated disruptions and attacks during the conflict.

According to estimates by Kpler, Iran’s floating oil storage near East Asian waters has fallen sharply in recent weeks as Tehran struggles to maintain exports to China despite mounting logistical constraints.

The United States and its allies retain significant escalation options economically and militarily, while Iran’s ability to sustain prolonged confrontation increasingly appears tied to its capacity to continue threatening shipping routes and regional stability.

But Washington also faces limits. A prolonged energy crisis, rising oil prices and fears of a wider regional war are creating growing pressure on the United States and Gulf allies to secure at least a temporary understanding with Tehran.

That pressure helps explain the renewed urgency surrounding the Doha talks.

What now seems increasingly clear is that neither Iran’s economy nor the global economy can sustain the current trajectory for much longer.

The question is no longer whether economic pressure is being felt. It is whether the pressure forces compromise before miscalculation produces another round of escalation.

Iran appears set to restore internet access after 3-months blackout

May 25, 2026, 22:30 GMT+1

Internet access in Iran appeared headed for restoration Monday as President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered a rollback of months-long restrictions and an IRGC-affiliated outlet appeared to fall in line behind the decision after initially questioning its legality.

Earlier in the day, Pezeshkian ordered the Ministry of Communications to restore international internet access to its pre-January status, according to his spokesman.

ICT Minister Sattar Hashemi later told Shargh daily that the process of restoring the country’s internet access had begun.

The semi-official ISNA news agency reported that the order is expected to be implemented on Tuesday.

The shift in tone became apparent after the IRGC-affiliated Fars News agency first questioned whether the administration had the authority to issue such an order, arguing that because the restrictions were imposed by the Supreme National Security Council, only the same body could formally reverse them.

Hours later, however, Fars appeared to soften its position in an editorial describing the reopening as a necessary “technical and security” decision that would have happened “sooner or later” as cyber conditions improved.

The outlet said the restrictions had originally been imposed to prevent cyber espionage and protect critical infrastructure during wartime conditions and an unprecedented wave of cyberattacks.

While acknowledging criticism over the legal process behind the decision, Fars dismissed efforts to turn the issue into a political dispute and accused some reformist media outlets of exploiting the shutdown to deepen internal divisions during what it described as a “full-scale war.”

The president’s order followed the fourth meeting of the Special Task Force on Cyberspace Management, which ended with nine votes in favor and three against reconnecting Iran to the global internet, according to reports.

Peyman Jebelli, head of Iran’s state broadcaster, and Mohammad-Amin Aghamiri, secretary of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace, were among the strongest opponents of restoring international internet access, Faraz reported citing informed sources.

According to Faraz, both men remained firmly opposed to reconnecting the country to the global internet until the end of the meeting.

The report said Aghamiri’s position was particularly notable because the secretary of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace is appointed by the president. Although Aghamiri was first appointed under the previous administration, Pezeshkian later retained him in the post.

Faraz said Aghamiri’s opposition had placed him at odds with the government at a time when Pezeshkian has publicly identified restoring internet access as one of his priorities.

Iran’s internet curbs choke AI startup opportunities

May 25, 2026, 13:22 GMT+1

Iran’s prolonged internet disruptions are shutting off a rare opening for young entrepreneurs to build low-cost businesses using artificial intelligence tools, according to a report by Shargh newspaper that warned the restrictions are crippling a generation of digital workers.

The disruptions have entered their 13th consecutive week, blocking or severely degrading access to many global online services that freelancers, software developers and content creators rely on to compete internationally, Shargh reported on Monday.

While AI tools have dramatically reduced the cost of launching new businesses worldwide, the report argued that internet restrictions inside Iran are preventing local entrepreneurs from benefiting from the shift.

  • Iran is turning the internet into a privilege

    Iran is turning the internet into a privilege

“Internet that was supposed to become the launch platform for a new generation of entrepreneurs has now turned into the biggest obstacle to establishing, growing and developing a new business,” the newspaper wrote.

Many young Iranians who could previously build businesses with little more than a laptop and free AI software are now struggling to access even basic online services because of filtering, unstable connections and rising infrastructure costs, Shargh said.

The report estimated direct economic losses from the disruption at more than 3000 trillion rials, roughly $4 billion, over a 60-day period. Daily losses for internet-dependent businesses were estimated at between $30 million and $40 million.

Tiered internet deepens pressure

The emergence of “internet pro” or tiered internet access has widened inequalities inside Iran’s digital economy by giving certain users and organizations access to higher-quality connections at sharply higher prices, added Shargh.

Silhouette of a man using a mobile phone during a nighttime internet blackout in Iran amid ongoing restrictions and connectivity disruptions. (undated)
100%
Silhouette of a man using a mobile phone during a nighttime internet blackout in Iran amid ongoing restrictions and connectivity disruptions.

Large-volume internet packages for preferred users are being sold for more than 20 million rials (around $12), the newspaper reported, adding that the model has significantly increased operating costs for small software teams already struggling with inflation and currency depreciation.

The minimum wage in Iran currently stands at just over $90 per month.

The report described the current environment as one where international internet access is increasingly treated as a luxury rather than a public utility.

  • Internet shutdown drives Iranians to leave country for access

    Internet shutdown drives Iranians to leave country for access

It said software companies face two immediate problems: rising infrastructure costs and the collapse of traditional digital marketing channels such as Google advertising and search visibility.

Under those conditions, businesses earning foreign currency revenue or reducing dependence on international infrastructure have become more attractive, according to the report.

AI lowers barriers but access remains limited

Advances in AI during the past two years, the report said, have sharply reduced software production costs worldwide by automating repetitive development work such as coding assistance, testing, documentation and early-stage interface design.

Tools including GitHub Copilot and AI coding assistants have increased software production speed by up to 50%, according to the report.

AI-generated image of a software developer facing service outages and online access problems in Iran’s restricted internet environment.
100%
AI-generated image of a software developer facing service outages and online access problems in Iran’s restricted internet environment.

But the newspaper said Iranian developers are increasingly unable to reliably access many of the same tools because of internet instability and restrictions.

Software teams, the report said, are increasingly shifting toward direct marketing methods such as SMS campaigns, webinars and messaging-platform advertising because conventional online advertising tools have become less effective under filtering conditions.

Family forced into nighttime burial after student killed in protests

May 25, 2026, 10:19 GMT+1
•
Farnoosh Faraji

Rauf Derakhshani-Mehr, a 19-year-old university student killed during January protests in the southern city of Dezful, was buried at night under pressure from security forces after his family located his body in a morgue, according to information obtained by Iran International.

Derakhshani-Mehr, a law student at Islamic Azad University, was shot dead during protests on January 9, a source familiar with the case said.

He was struck by a live bullet in the side and had also suffered metal pellet wounds to the left side of his body before the fatal shooting, the source said.

After he was transferred to Ganjavian hospital, his body was left alongside those of several other young protesters in the hospital grounds, according to witnesses and hospital staff cited by the source.

Witnesses said wounded protesters were denied treatment and that several people died because they did not receive medical care. Blood covered parts of the hospital grounds because of the severity of the injuries, they added.

Family searched hospitals and morgues

Derakhshani-Mehr’s family spent hours searching for him and went to the hospital, where officials initially denied he was there despite the family checking different wards.

Emergency personnel later told the family his body was being held in the hospital morgue, but security forces sealed the facility and prevented relatives from seeing him, the source added.

Family members were also given conflicting information by different authorities and were at one point told that he was still alive.

His body was eventually identified at the forensic medicine office in Ahvaz after being transferred there as an unidentified person, according to the account received by Iran International.

Before handing over the body, authorities forced the family to agree that the burial would take place at night and attended only by a small number of people. Derakhshani-Mehr was buried in Shahidabad cemetery in Dezful.

Night burials reported in earlier crackdowns

Security forces in Iran have previously buried slain protesters at night or without notifying their families.

In one case previously reported by Iran International, a 16-year-old boy named Reza who was killed during protests in Karaj was secretly buried by members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps without his family’s knowledge.

  • How one Tehran hospital became a window into Iran’s January massacre

    How one Tehran hospital became a window into Iran’s January massacre

Witnesses said Reza was shot by a sniper around 9 p.m. on January 8 in the Shahin Vila neighborhood of Karaj. He later died after being moved to a residential parking area and then taken to a clinic.

People familiar with the case said the teenager’s family was informed the following day that members of the Revolutionary Guards had buried him overnight and disclosed the location of the grave afterward.

Iran executes another detainee arrested during January protests

May 25, 2026, 10:01 GMT+1

The Islamic Republic executed Abbas Akbari Feyzabadi, a detainee arrested during January protests in Isfahan province, after the Supreme Court upheld his death sentence, the judiciary said on Monday.

Akbari Feyzabadi had been convicted on charges including moharebeh, or waging war against God, “deliberate destruction of public property, disrupting public order and collusion against national security,” Judiciary news outlet Mizan said.

The court cited what it described as the defendant’s confessions about carrying a handgun, appearing in the streets and opening fire during the unrest in Naein county, the report said.

The Supreme Court, judiciary said, upheld the ruling after reviewing the case file and found no flaws in the verdict, which it said was based on evidence, documentation and the defendant’s statements.

Cases involving espionage and national security accusations in the Islamic Republic have long drawn scrutiny from rights groups and lawyers over allegations of forced confessions, torture, restricted access to independent lawyers and denial of fair trial guarantees.

With Akbari Feyzabadi’s execution, at least 38 prisoners convicted on political or security-related charges have been executed in Iran since March 18, according to a tally based on publicly reported cases.

  • Iran executes another political prisoner, bringing tally to 37 since March

    Iran executes another political prisoner, bringing tally to 37 since March

Rights group HRANA had previously said at least 52 prisoners facing political or security-related charges were executed during the past Iranian year.

Lawmakers back executions

On May 4, 63 members of parliament issued a statement thanking the judiciary for carrying out death sentences against January protest detainees and urged Judiciary Chief Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei to take what they called decisive and public action against the “main elements” behind the protests.

The judiciary’s media outlet reported Sunday that another political prisoner, Mojtaba Kian, was executed after being convicted in Alborz province of sending information about defense industry sites to networks linked to the United States and Israel during attacks on Iran.

Iranian security forces have arrested thousands of people across the country on political and security-related accusations since the start of US and Israeli attacks on Feb. 28.