Meta Removes Multiple Iran-Linked Pages, Accounts
Meta says it has removed 40 Facebook accounts, eight pages and one group affiliated with Iran for violating its policy against coordinated inauthentic behavior.
Meta says it has removed 40 Facebook accounts, eight pages and one group affiliated with Iran for violating its policy against coordinated inauthentic behavior.
The tech giant said these accounts and pages were mainly aimed at Israel, France, and Bahrain.
In its first quarterly adversarial threat report in 2023, Meta said this operation ran across multiple internet services—including Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, YouTube, and hacking forums—where it claimed to have hacked entities in the countries they targeted, including news media, logistics and transport companies, educational institutions, an airport, a dating service, and a government institution.
“The individuals behind this network alleged to have stolen these organizations’ data or defaced their websites. We cannot confirm if any of the claimed attacks against these entities have, in fact, occurred. We removed this network before it was able to gain a following among authentic communities on our platforms.”
It further added that multiple distinct clusters posed as separate hacktivist teams, with each only active for a few days to a few weeks.
Accordingly, three separate clusters focused on Israel, where they offered to sell hacked data that allegedly belonged to commercial companies, educational institutions, and a dating app. Another cluster that targeted Bahrain claimed to have hacked government websites before the country's elections.
“It was removed last year by both automation and our investigative team. The final cluster focused on France and claimed to have hacked the Charlie Hebdo newspaper. The news media reported some of these individual claims in Israel, Bahrain, and France,” underlined Meta.
The people behind this network used fake accounts to post, like and share their own content to make it appear more popular than it was, as well as to manage pages and groups posing as hacktivist teams.
They also liked and shared other people’s posts about cybersecurity topics, likely to make fake accounts look more credible.
Some of these accounts used profile photos likely generated using machine learning techniques like generative adversarial networks. Meta says it found the full scope of this activity after reviewing information shared with the company by its peers at Microsoft.
Based on the report, around 750 accounts followed one or more of these pages; around 80 accounts joined one or more of these groups.
Last year, the US Congress said it was investigating the Meta social media network to find out why the platform is censoring content by Iranian dissidents and pro-democracy advocates.
Following reports that the social media giant might be aiding the Iranian government amid a wave of protests, three Republican lawmakers on the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees have launched a probe into the matter, a copy of which was published by the Washington Free Beacon on Tuesday.
Speaking before the Friday prayers in Qomm on May 5, Arafi was referring to at least four clerics who have been killed in recent months and a few others who suffered serious injuries by incidents of car ramming. He said, "The clerics' martyrdom was both painful and a source for pride."
Arafi, however, attributed the attacks to "conspiracies hatched and engineered by the enemies in the form of a hybrid war." This comes while some media outlets and sociologists in Iran say the attacks show young Iranians' anger and frustration as their demands have been ignored for several years.
Meanwhile, prominent female jurisconsult Sedigheh Vasmaghi has welcomed a statement by Qom cleric Ayatollah Mohammad Javad Alavi Boroujerdi. The cleric had recently said about the attacks that "The clerics' words and approach has led to insecurity and created grudge and hatred in the society."
Borujerdi had further called on the clerics who are part of the Islamic government in Iran to apologize to women and the rest of the nation for their words and approaches toward women and the issue of hijab.
Vasmaghi agreed with him that clerics' school of thought has made the Iranian society insecure. She also said that the clergy owe much to Iranian women for what they have said during the past four decades.
She also said that they should have paid attention to warnings about public anger and the widening gap between themselves and the people. Vasmaghi reiterated: "There should be security in the society for all citizens. It is not possible to keep one part of the society safe at the price of others' insecurity."
Meanwhile, the firebrand Friday Imam of Tehran, Ahmad Khatami claimed that clerics are still popular in Iran although their image is being tarnished on social media. Although he tried to pretend that he was unshaken as a result of the attacks, yet he made a few fatalistic remarks such as "We all have to leave this world one day anyway," and "We will have to go no matter if we like it or not. We are all bound for eternity."
Khatami also dedicated a large part of his sermon to the attacks on clerics and praised them for facing death in cold blood. He said, "The reason for these attacks is that the clerics' presence annoys arrogant powers [the United States]." However, he did not explain why major politicians like himself are safe while the attacks often target low-key clerical figures.
Some unconfirmed social media reports said the Ministry of Interior has warned clerics at seminaries to leave their robes and put on ordinary outfit when they have to go into the public.
Khatami then called on the Judiciary to take swift measures to punish those who have attacked the clerics. The latest attack still remains a mystery in Bobol in the Caspian region where a cleric, Ebrahim Fazel, who is the son of the dean of the city's seminary was found dead in the sea and his death remains unresolved. He asked the Judiciary to make Iran insecure for those who attack the clerics.
In another development, Hossein Ansarian, a prominent cleric who has recently criticized the government for its heavy-handed and outdated approach to compulsory hijab, said: "Some of us clerics belong to 100 years ago, some others to even 200 years ago and are not fit for today. What we say from the pulpits are no good for the modern society." He added that some clerics who lived in the 20th century preached in a way that served modern men and women.